Back injuries have been the leading cause of disability in the
United States for people younger than 45 years and have been the most
expensive health care problem for the 30- to 50-year-old age group.
"Low back pain should be viewed as a chronic problem
with an untidy pattern of grumbling symptoms and periods of
relative freedom from pain and disability interspersed with
acute episodes, exacerbations, and recurrences" (1). Two
consistent observations about low back pain include:
firstly, a previous episode of low back pain is the strongest risk
factor for a new episode, and, secondly, by the age of 30
years almost half the population will have experienced a substantive
episode of low back pain.
It is a common misconception that most episodes of low back pain
will resolve within one month. In fact, most people who consulted a
general medical practitioner continued to have long term low back pain
and disability (1). Effective early treatment could reduce the burden
of these problems and their social, economic, and health impact.
One intervention that has been used in attempt to prevent back
injuries is the back belt. Despite scientific uncertainty about
effectiveness, wearing a back belt with the hope of preventing costly
and disabling low back injury in employees is becoming common in the
workplace.
The use of back belts to prevent musculoskeletal injuries has been
controversial. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH, 1994) conducted a literature review in which they
concluded:
…the effectiveness of using back belts to lessen the risk of back
injury among uninjured workers remains unproven…there is
insufficient evidence indicating that typical industrial back belts
significantly reduce the biomechanical loading of the trunk during
manual lifting….backbelts do not mitigate the hazards to
workers posted by repeated lifting, pushing, pulling, twisting and
bending...
A recent study in the December 6th issue of the Journal
of the American Medical Association (2) was designed to evaluate
the effectiveness of using back belts in reducing back injury claims
and low back pain. Material-handling employees in 160 new retail
merchandise stores were included in the study. Of the 13 873 material
handlers at these stores, 9466 people completed a baseline interview
and 6311 people completed both the baseline and follow-up interview.
Results of this study indicated that neither frequent back belt use
nor a store policy that required belt use was associated with reduced
incidence of back injury claims or low back pain.
On a personal note, I have been involved in a project at Miami
University along with Drs. Marvin Dainoff, Leonard Mark, and graduate
student Shawn Oates entitled "Wearing a Back Belt Affects Working
Posture During Reaching". This presentation has been selected for
the 4th Annual Applied Ergonomics Conference, March 12-15, 2001 in
Orlando, Florida.
References:
-
Croft PR, Macfarlane GJ, Papageorgiou AC, et al. Outcome of low
back pain in general practice: a prospective study. BMJ
1998;316(7141):1356-1359.
-
Wassell JT, Gardner LI, Landsittel DP, et al. A prospective
study of back belts for prevention of back pain and injury. JAMA
2000;284:2727-2732.
______________________________
*HEALTH RESEARCH
One in four deaths among men aged 15-29 in
Europe is now attributable to alcohol, as "binge drinking"
penetrates youth culture in both the industrialised and
developing world, Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, the director
general of the World Health Organization (WHO), told a
European ministerial conference on young people and
alcohol in Stockholm.
The results indicate that palpation and vectored
atlas adjustment causes a significant decrease in systolic blood
pressure in patients with putative upper cervical subluxation/joint
dysfunction in comparison with resting controls. Similar results
were also demonstrated when subjects acted as their own controls.
This Commentary discusses the importance of
recognizing and documenting the influence of vertebral subluxation
and the results of it’s correction and reduction on women’s
health. The discussion explores several themes including the active
participation of women in health care, the gender gap that exists in
research and an overview of the allopathic approach towards
women’s concerns.
______________________________
HOW TO CONTACT US
Essence of Wellness Chiropractic Center
Dean Smith, D.C., M.Sc.
Jane Palmer Smith, D.C.
890 South Barron St.
Eaton, Ohio 45320
(937) 456-4555
Forward this e-newsletter to a friend!